Сообщение: 25327 Написал: sydap2003 Ваш ответ:, 
Hello
Please attach detailed report with all magic.
I see that your magics have different numbers and the number of digits?

Message: 25328 Posted: expforex your answer , Message: 25328 Posted: expforex your answer , 

The log file is large and it is taking over an hour to download from my VPS. But it won't be of any help since I had to deselect USDJPY from the Symbols in order for the EA to work as I need it to.

For each currency pair I have 4 magics or types of trades. Initial, re-entry, scale-in and hedge.

eg for USDJPY I have 24245,242451,242511 from the trading EA and then the hedge trade which is from a different EA with magic 925245.

I don't want the CloseMinusPlus to look at the hedge trades, ie the magics starting with 9. And so I have NOT entered the numbers starting with 9 in the MagicstoClose as you can see from the set file I sent.

But the CloseMinusbyPlus is looking at all magics and so it seems that the MagicstoClose filter is not working. In my case it was with USDJPY.

When I have USDJPY in the Symbols and even when I do NOT have 925245 in the Magics, the EA still picks up this trade, 925245, because it is the largest losing trade.
When I remove USDJPY from the Symbols, only then does the EA ignore this 924245 USDJPY trade.

So the Symbol filter works but the Magics filter does not.

Message: 25329 Posted: sydap2003 your answer , 

Maybe this screenshot will help.

yes, sorry

Message: 25331 Posted: expforex your answer , 

Thanks, new version now working for Magics.

Regards, Andrew

Thank you

Message: 25333
Posted: expforex
your answer , 
Hello

I was wondering whether you would be prepared to add one extra condition/filter to this EA.

It might be called MinimumPositiontoClose; and would work as follows.

Currently, the EA looks for the single most unprofitable position to close. But if we could have a setting and set Min PostoClose to say 4, then it would look for the 4 most unprofitable positions in total and try to close them all at once.

(Because in my case I often have up to 40 (small) losing positions fully hedged against a single (large) hedge trade. So when the hedge goes positive I want to close as many as possible losing trades.)

Сообщение: 25357
Написал: sydap2003
Ваш ответ:, 

Hello.
I can not promise such an algorithm.
But I will think about this proposal.

Сообщение: 25358
Написал: expforex
Ваш ответ:, 

Thanks.

Добавлено (10.02.2020, 10:49)
---------------------------------------------
Message: 25358
Posted: expforex
your answer , 

Hello
I have been thinking about this request and wonder whether it would be easier to just be able to specify the MinLoss as we do now but then have an extra filter where we could choose between the MinLoss from 1 trade (as it is now by default) to "any" number of trades which make up the MinLoss set.

So eg, if we set MinLoss to -100 and NumberofLosing was set to "any", and there were 5 open losing trades of $20 then those five would be closed when conditions were met.

And when NumberofLosing was set to 1, then the EA would operate as it does now.

That might make the algo simpler?

Добрый день! почему советник не закрывает убыточный ордер, хотя есть плюсовые ордера которые могут перекрыть этот убыточный ордер с плюсом.  Настройки -10 долл убыточные ордера... перекрытие 2 долл...позиций для закрытия 5... магики -1 и -1. И еще...как советник считает профит для закрытия? на панели написано current profit 6 долл. Хотя плюсовых позиций на 30 долл и надо закрыть убыточный ордер -18 долл?